
Attorneys Defending Bankruptcy Bankruptcy Preference Claims Nationwide: 888.547.5170
The pursuit of bankruptcy preference claims is not mandatory under the Bankruptcy Code.FN1 Whether or not bankruptcy preference recovery will be pursued is determined by a combination »»
In this Introduction to the VIDEO series, we will discuss the the basics of bankruptcy preference actions. This section also outlines the remaining 6 parts of the »»
In 2005, the Bankruptcy Code was amended to limit by dollar amount the transfers that could be avoided in a commercial case. This commonly is called »»
One of the less frequently seen defenses to a bankruptcy preference is based on Section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code. We believe that there are many more »»
[Last updated: September 5, 2011] At the same time as Congress established a jurisdictional threshold requirement for bringing a preference claim, it also restricted the location of »»
We have developed a 5 part video series entitled: “Video Review of the Elements of an Adversary Proceeding Complaint to Recover Bankruptcy Preferences.” Part 1, which is »»
This is Part 2 of our series on the elements of an adversary proceeding complaint is provided below. This second part is entitled: “The Caption of »»
Three lesser known defenses to bankruptcy preference claims are: the earmarking defense, the conduit defense and the agency defense. The defenses have different and distinct elements. »»
1786 creditors received a total of $485 million in payments from Borders, Inc. or its co-debtors (“Borders” or the “Debtors”) in the 90 days before their bankruptcy. »»
Last updated September 7, 2011. The timing of preference claims is affected by 3 major factors: the statute of limitations; the desire of the debtor to re-establish »»