
Attorneys Defending Bankruptcy Bankruptcy Preference Claims Nationwide: 888.547.5170
In 2005, the Bankruptcy Code was amended to limit by dollar amount the transfers that could be avoided in a commercial case. This commonly is called »»
One of the less frequently seen defenses to a bankruptcy preference is based on Section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code. We believe that there are many more »»
Three lesser known defenses to bankruptcy preference claims are: the earmarking defense, the conduit defense and the agency defense. The defenses have different and distinct elements. »»
06/02/2011 – Memorandum Opinion re Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss filed in the Kimball Hill, Inc. Bankruptcy – Adv. Proc. No.: 10-00824 - Defendant Wisenbaker Builder Services, Inc. »»
If yours is a business facing a bankruptcy preference claim for the first time, we have developed a set of educational material, which include a video series »»
The contemporaneous exchange defense is one of the most often disputed defenses. It should not be that way. The focus of the defense is very »»
How many defenses to a bankruptcy preferential transfer recovery action are there? Well this is a matter of some debate. A bankruptcy preference “technocrat” would say there »»
The subsequent new value defense is perhaps the most used defense. It is, from a books and records perspective, the easiest defense to prove. The focus is »»
One of the most critical but often overlooked opportunities to defend bankruptcy preference claims regards the ability to apply multiple defenses when there have been multiple payments. »»
By asking and answering three simple questions, a bankruptcy preference defendant can perform a rough cut, preliminary self-assessment of exposure to an avoidable transfer claim under Section »»