<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bankruptcy Preference Creditor&#039;s Digest &#187; administrative expense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.burbageweddell.com/tag/administrative-claim/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.burbageweddell.com</link>
	<description>Bankruptcy creditor lawyers with practice concentration in bankruptcy preference law, creditor protection in commercial bankruptcy, preference claim resolution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:15:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bankruptcy Creditor 503(b)(9) Administrative Expense</title>
		<link>http://www.burbageweddell.com/bankruptcy-creditor-rights-overview/section-503b9-administrative-expense-claims/</link>
		<comments>http://www.burbageweddell.com/bankruptcy-creditor-rights-overview/section-503b9-administrative-expense-claims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 03:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>burbageweddell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BANKRUPTCY PREFERENTIAL TRANSFER ASSESSMENT, DEFENSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administrative expense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 503(b)(9)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burbageweddell.com/?page_id=2844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>For suppliers Section 503(b)(9) can mean the difference between receiving nothing and being paid 100% of the value of the goods delivered in the 20 day period <a href="http://www.burbageweddell.com/bankruptcy-creditor-rights-overview/section-503b9-administrative-expense-claims/"  >&#187;&#187;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.burbageweddell.com/bankruptcy-creditor-rights-overview/section-503b9-administrative-expense-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>503(b)(9) Administrative Expense Claim</title>
		<link>http://www.burbageweddell.com/resources/sample-503b9-motion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.burbageweddell.com/resources/sample-503b9-motion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 02:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>burbageweddell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BANKRUPTCY PREFERENCE, AVOIDANCE ACTIONS, ADVERSARY PROCEEDINGS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administrative expense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 503(b)(9)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burbageweddell.com/?page_id=1167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT</p>
<p>DISTRICT OF DELAWARE</p>



In re:</p>
<p>[Bankrupt Customer's Name]</p>
<p>Reorganized   Debtor.
)
Chapter [7] [11]Case No. 00-00000-AAA


)


)


)


)


)


)


)


)


[Name of Customer's Bankruptcy Representative]</p>
<p>Plaintiff,</p>
<p>v.</p>
<p>[Your Company's Name]</p>
<p>Defendant
)
Adversary Proceeding
No. 00-000000


)


)


)


)


)


)


)


)


)



<p>MOTION OF [SUPPLIER] FOR <a href="http://www.burbageweddell.com/resources/sample-503b9-motion/"  >&#187;&#187;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.burbageweddell.com/resources/sample-503b9-motion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sec. 503 &#8211; Administrative Expenses</title>
		<link>http://www.burbageweddell.com/resources/bankruptcy-creditor-statutes/statutes-bankrutpcy-code-section-503-annotated/</link>
		<comments>http://www.burbageweddell.com/resources/bankruptcy-creditor-statutes/statutes-bankrutpcy-code-section-503-annotated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 20:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>burbageweddell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BANKRUPTCY PREFERENTIAL TRANSFER ASSESSMENT, DEFENSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administrative expense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 503(b)(9)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burbageweddell.com/?page_id=3853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>TITLE 11&#8211;BANKRUPTCY
CHAPTER 5&#8211;CREDITORS, THE DEBTOR, AND THE ESTATE
SUBCHAPTER I&#8211;CREDITORS AND CLAIMS
From the U.S. Code Online via GPO Access &#8211; Current as of December 12, 2009 *
</p>
Click this <a href="http://www.burbageweddell.com/resources/bankruptcy-creditor-statutes/statutes-bankrutpcy-code-section-503-annotated/"  >&#187;&#187;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.burbageweddell.com/resources/bankruptcy-creditor-statutes/statutes-bankrutpcy-code-section-503-annotated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Subsequent Advance&#8221; Approach to Subsequent New Value May Still Live in the Eleventh Circuit… and Payment of 503(b)(9) Administrative Expense Claim Held to Reduce Subsequent New Value Defense to Bankruptcy Preference</title>
		<link>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2010/06/06/ti-acquisition-snv-decision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2010/06/06/ti-acquisition-snv-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 04:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>burbageweddell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[RECENT, SIGNIFICANT BANKRUPTCY PREFERENCE DECISIONS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administrative expense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy preference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defenses and limitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 503(b)(9)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subsequent new value defense]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burbageweddell.com/?p=6078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A simple statement of the April 28, 2010 holding in TI Acquisition, LLC, v. Southern Polymer, Inc. 2010 WL 1993848 (Bankr.N.D.Ga.), may paint the decision as adverse <a href="http://www.burbageweddell.com/2010/06/06/ti-acquisition-snv-decision/"  >&#187;&#187;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2010/06/06/ti-acquisition-snv-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Pre-Petition Deliveries Provide a Bankruptcy Preference &#8220;New Value&#8221; Defense and Section 503(b)(9) Administrative Expense?</title>
		<link>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2010/02/02/prepetition-deliveries-dual-benefit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2010/02/02/prepetition-deliveries-dual-benefit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 14:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>burbageweddell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[RECENT, SIGNIFICANT BANKRUPTCY PREFERENCE DECISIONS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administrative expense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy preference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defenses and limitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 503(b)(9)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subsequent new value defense]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burbageweddell.com/?p=5332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Does a supplier have to choose between asserting a subsequent new value bankruptcy preference defense and making a Section 503(b)(9) administrative expense request?  Judge Marian F. Harrison <a href="http://www.burbageweddell.com/2010/02/02/prepetition-deliveries-dual-benefit/"  >&#187;&#187;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2010/02/02/prepetition-deliveries-dual-benefit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grede Foundries &#8211; Debtors’ Bankruptcy Preference vs Administrative Expense Ploy – A Tactic that Needs to be Stopped</title>
		<link>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/12/08/bankruptcy-preference-vs-administrative-expense-ploy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/12/08/bankruptcy-preference-vs-administrative-expense-ploy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>burbageweddell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BANKRUPTCY PREFERENCE, AVOIDANCE ACTIONS, ADVERSARY PROCEEDINGS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administrative expense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[avoidable transfer elements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy preference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grede Foundries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 503(b)(9)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burbageweddell.com/?p=3761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In adding Section 503(b)(9) in the 2005 amendments to the Bankruptcy Code, did Congress intend that the supplier beneficiaries of the new section would wear a sign <a href="http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/12/08/bankruptcy-preference-vs-administrative-expense-ploy/"  >&#187;&#187;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/12/08/bankruptcy-preference-vs-administrative-expense-ploy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cadence Innovations &#8211; Best, Worst Examples of Using 503(b)(9) Claims to Settle Bankruptcy Preference Claims</title>
		<link>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/06/22/cadence-innovation-bankruptcy-preference-claims-settlements-start/</link>
		<comments>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/06/22/cadence-innovation-bankruptcy-preference-claims-settlements-start/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 04:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>burbageweddell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BANKRUPTCY PREFERENCE, AVOIDANCE ACTIONS, ADVERSARY PROCEEDINGS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administrative expense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy preference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cadence Innovation Liquidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[negotiation and resolution process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 503(b)(9)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burbageweddell.com/?p=2926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Increasing instances of administrative insolvency, especially in the automotive sector, have caused many suppliers to question the value of 503(b)(9) claims.  Even when administrative expense claims are <a href="http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/06/22/cadence-innovation-bankruptcy-preference-claims-settlements-start/"  >&#187;&#187;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/06/22/cadence-innovation-bankruptcy-preference-claims-settlements-start/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grede Foundries &#8211; Debtor Onslaught to Disallow Supplier 503(b)(9) Administrative Expenses</title>
		<link>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/11/29/503b9-onslaughts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/11/29/503b9-onslaughts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>burbageweddell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Grede Foundries Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administrative expense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy creditor rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grede Foundries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 503(b)(9)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burbageweddell.com/?p=3716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Bankrupt retailer and manufacturer attacks on allowance of administrative expenses under Section 503(b)(9) of the Bankruptcy Code are increasing in frequency, breadth and ingenuity.  One recent case <a href="http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/11/29/503b9-onslaughts/"  >&#187;&#187;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/11/29/503b9-onslaughts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cooper-Standard Automotive Combo 503(b)(9) Claims, Essential Supplier and Foreign Vendor Motion</title>
		<link>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/08/03/cooperstandard-automotive-supplier-prepetition-claims-motion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/08/03/cooperstandard-automotive-supplier-prepetition-claims-motion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 18:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>burbageweddell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cooper-Standard Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administrative expense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automotive suppliers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy creditor rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cooper-Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[critical or essential supplier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 503(b)(9)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burbageweddell.com/?p=3219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Cooper-Standard Holdings Inc. and its affiliated debtors (“Cooper-Standard Automotive” or the “Debtors”) have combined into one motion a request to allow payment of 503(b)(9) administrative expense claims, <a href="http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/08/03/cooperstandard-automotive-supplier-prepetition-claims-motion/"  >&#187;&#187;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/08/03/cooperstandard-automotive-supplier-prepetition-claims-motion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Critical Vendor Motion in Arclin Bankruptcy Raises Questions for 503(b)(9) Claimants</title>
		<link>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/07/28/critical-vendor-motion-arclin-bankruptcy-raises-questions-503b9-claimants/</link>
		<comments>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/07/28/critical-vendor-motion-arclin-bankruptcy-raises-questions-503b9-claimants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>burbageweddell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arclin Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administrative expense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arclin US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy creditor rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[critical or essential supplier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 503(b)(9)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burbageweddell.com/?p=3144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The first day motion of Arclin US Holdings Inc. and its 6 co-debtor affiliates (“Arclin”) to pay “critical vendors” illustrates how dramatically the “critical vendor” concept can <a href="http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/07/28/critical-vendor-motion-arclin-bankruptcy-raises-questions-503b9-claimants/"  >&#187;&#187;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/07/28/critical-vendor-motion-arclin-bankruptcy-raises-questions-503b9-claimants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 14/50 queries in 0.724 seconds using disk

Served from: www.burbageweddell.com @ 2010-07-30 02:10:52 -->