<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bankruptcy Preference - Bankruptcy Creditor Law &#38; Bankruptcy Preference Defense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.burbageweddell.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.burbageweddell.com</link>
	<description>Bankruptcy creditor lawyers with practice concentration in bankruptcy preference law, creditor protection in commercial bankruptcy, preference claim resolution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:57:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Bankruptcy Preference Statute of Limitations Trustee Appointment Extension</title>
		<link>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2010/02/23/bankruptcy-preference-statute-limitations-trustee-appointment-extension/</link>
		<comments>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2010/02/23/bankruptcy-preference-statute-limitations-trustee-appointment-extension/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 03:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>burbageweddell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Preference Claims Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[avoidable transfer elements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy preference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defenses and limitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homebanc Mortgage Corporation Bankruptcy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burbageweddell.com/?p=5445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The HomeBanc Mortgage Corporation bankruptcy was filed on August 9, 2007, well over 2 years and 5 months ago.  This week 386 bankruptcy preference adversary proceeding complaints <a href="http://www.burbageweddell.com/2010/02/23/bankruptcy-preference-statute-limitations-trustee-appointment-extension/"  >&#187;&#187;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2010/02/23/bankruptcy-preference-statute-limitations-trustee-appointment-extension/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Pre-Petition Deliveries Provide a Bankruptcy Preference &#8220;New Value&#8221; Defense and Section 503(b)(9) Administrative Expense?</title>
		<link>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2010/02/02/prepetition-deliveries-dual-benefit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2010/02/02/prepetition-deliveries-dual-benefit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 14:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>burbageweddell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[defenses and limitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administrative expense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy preference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 503(b)(9)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subsequent new value defense]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burbageweddell.com/?p=5332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Does a supplier have to choose between asserting a subsequent new value bankruptcy preference defense and making a Section 503(b)(9) administrative expense request?  Judge Marian F. Harrison <a href="http://www.burbageweddell.com/2010/02/02/prepetition-deliveries-dual-benefit/"  >&#187;&#187;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2010/02/02/prepetition-deliveries-dual-benefit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debtors’ Bankruptcy Preference vs Administrative Expense Ploy &#8211; A Tactic that Needs to be Stopped</title>
		<link>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/12/08/bankruptcy-preference-vs-administrative-expense-ploy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/12/08/bankruptcy-preference-vs-administrative-expense-ploy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>burbageweddell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Grede Foundries Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administrative expense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[avoidable transfer elements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy preference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grede Foundries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 503(b)(9)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burbageweddell.com/?p=3761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In adding Section 503(b)(9) in the 2005 amendments to the Bankruptcy Code, did Congress intend that the supplier beneficiaries of the new section would wear a sign <a href="http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/12/08/bankruptcy-preference-vs-administrative-expense-ploy/"  >&#187;&#187;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/12/08/bankruptcy-preference-vs-administrative-expense-ploy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best, Worst Examples of Using 503(b)(9) Claims to Settle Bankruptcy Preference Claims</title>
		<link>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/06/22/cadence-innovation-bankruptcy-preference-claims-settlements-start/</link>
		<comments>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/06/22/cadence-innovation-bankruptcy-preference-claims-settlements-start/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 04:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>burbageweddell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cadence Innovation Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administrative expense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy preference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cadence Innovation Liquidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[negotiation and resolution process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 503(b)(9)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burbageweddell.com/?p=2926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Increasing instances of administrative insolvency, especially in the automotive sector, have caused many suppliers to question the value of 503(b)(9) claims.  Even when administrative expense claims are <a href="http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/06/22/cadence-innovation-bankruptcy-preference-claims-settlements-start/"  >&#187;&#187;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/06/22/cadence-innovation-bankruptcy-preference-claims-settlements-start/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debtor Onslaught to Disallow Supplier 503(b)(9) Administrative Expenses</title>
		<link>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/11/29/503b9-onslaughts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/11/29/503b9-onslaughts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>burbageweddell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Grede Foundries Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administrative expense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy creditor rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grede Foundries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 503(b)(9)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burbageweddell.com/?p=3716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Bankrupt retailer and manufacturer attacks on allowance of administrative expenses under Section 503(b)(9) of the Bankruptcy Code are increasing in frequency, breadth and ingenuity.  One recent case <a href="http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/11/29/503b9-onslaughts/"  >&#187;&#187;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/11/29/503b9-onslaughts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>27 Automotive Suppliers File Chapter 11 Bankruptcies in 2009; End of Year Status Summary; Likelihood of Bankruptcy Preference Recovery</title>
		<link>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2010/01/09/27-automotive-supplier-chapter-11s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2010/01/09/27-automotive-supplier-chapter-11s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 19:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>burbageweddell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contech Bankruptcy, Sale - Creditor Aspects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cooper-Standard Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edscha North America Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fluid Routing Solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foamex International Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FormTech Industries Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Safety Textiles - GST - ITG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grede Foundries Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lear Corporation Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaldyne Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noble International Ltd. Bankruptcy - Creditor Aspects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PTC Alliance Corp. Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recticel North America Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stant Corporation Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visteon Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automotive suppliers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 363 Sale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burbageweddell.com/?p=4747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Pressures in the global automotive industry forced 27 FN1 automotive parts and component manufacturers and 2 automakers to seek Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in 2009.  The number <a href="http://www.burbageweddell.com/2010/01/09/27-automotive-supplier-chapter-11s/"  >&#187;&#187;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2010/01/09/27-automotive-supplier-chapter-11s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fluid Routing Solution Bankruptcy to Convert to 7, Preference Claims Coming</title>
		<link>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/09/16/fluid-routing-solution-bankruptcy-convert-7-preference-claims-coming/</link>
		<comments>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/09/16/fluid-routing-solution-bankruptcy-convert-7-preference-claims-coming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>burbageweddell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fluid Routing Solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fluid Routing Solutions Bankrputcy Preference Actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy preference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 11 conversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fluid Routing Solutions Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[negotiation and resolution process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 363 Sale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burbageweddell.com/?p=3350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The other shoe in the Fluid Routing Solutions (now know as Carolina Fluid Handling Intermediate Holding Corp.) bankruptcy has finally dropped.  On September 14, 2009, slightly <a href="http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/09/16/fluid-routing-solution-bankruptcy-convert-7-preference-claims-coming/"  >&#187;&#187;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/09/16/fluid-routing-solution-bankruptcy-convert-7-preference-claims-coming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Documentation Makes Contemporaneous Exchange Preference Defense a Winner</title>
		<link>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/01/11/the-contemporaneous-exchange-defense/</link>
		<comments>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/01/11/the-contemporaneous-exchange-defense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JSBurbage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[defenses and limitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy preference]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burbageweddell.com/?p=669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this pose, we address THE CONTEMPORANEOUS EXCHANGE DEFENSE.  In particular we discuss the following elements:  the “Zone of Information” that applies to this defense;  the basic elements of the defense;  and a simple example of the application of the defense.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/01/11/the-contemporaneous-exchange-defense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bankruptcy Preference Subsequent New Value Defense</title>
		<link>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/01/11/subsequent-new-value/</link>
		<comments>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/01/11/subsequent-new-value/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 22:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>burbageweddell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[defenses and limitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy preference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subsequent new value defense]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burbageweddell.com/?p=678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this post, which includes a short video presentation, we review the “subsequent new value” defense, including: the “Zone of Information” that applies to this defense;  the basic elements of the defense; and a simple example of the application of the defense.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/01/11/subsequent-new-value/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Multiple Payments &#8211; Multiple Bankruptcy Preference Defenses &#8211; Mixing and Matching</title>
		<link>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/01/11/multiple-payments-multiple-defenses-mixing-and-matching/</link>
		<comments>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/01/11/multiple-payments-multiple-defenses-mixing-and-matching/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 22:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JSBurbage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[defenses and limitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy preference]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.burbageweddell.com/?p=683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this post, which includes a short video, we review the mixing and matching of defenses in the case of multiple payments in the preference period.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.burbageweddell.com/2009/01/11/multiple-payments-multiple-defenses-mixing-and-matching/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
